You are here
Home > Movies > Initial Reviews are Out for ‘Ghostbusters’ Reboot

Initial Reviews are Out for ‘Ghostbusters’ Reboot

Ghostbusters, Columbia Pictures, Empire

The first reviews for the upcoming Paul Feig (Bridesmaids) reboot of Ghostbusters are out, and they a bit of a surprise. Most of the reviews are not gleaming, nor are they horrible. Most of the reviews say that the cast of the film was fine, but at times the movie felt more like a summer blockbuster and less a campy comedy like the original. The biggest criticisms of the film are about its lack of creativity, and that the film is afraid to try to stray from the trappings of the original films.

It seems as though the fear of straying to far away from the originals got the best of Feig and Sony. There will be some people on both sides of the fence. There are key elements that are getting praise: the humor in the film is good, along with all the scares, while the biggest criticisms are about the film’s failure to innovate.

The film is holding a firm 67% Metacritic score, and a 76% rating on Rotten Tomatoes. These numbers will either dip or climb when the film hits theaters this Thursday night. You can see some of the reviews below (courtesy of Dark Horizons):

Ghostbusters, Columbia Pictures
How will audiences react to the all-new ‘Ghostbusters’ reboot? Image: Columbia Pictures

The Good

“Feig’s Ghostbusters is its own definitive creature, an affable, inventive riff on Ivan Reitman’s proton-packing caper that exists not to score points, but only to make us laugh. For a summer comedy, there’s no nobler purpose. It’s all presented with a wink—there’s nothing heavy-spirited or assaultive about this Ghostbusters. Feig, who co-wrote the script with Katie Dippold, has clearly taken great care with the movie’s tone – it’s as delicately balanced as the wings of a spectral butterfly…” – Stephanie Zacharek, TIME

“I can’t wait for the sequel to Ghostbusters 2016. The characters are so engaging, their world is so fun and the actresses are so incredibly likeable that I’m exciting to see more… in a film that doesn’t feel endlessly beholden to bow in the direction of the 1984 original every five minutes. And perhaps in a film whose script actually works in the third act. But definitely in a film that is as funny and full of energy as this one…” – Devin Faraci, Birth Movies Death

“[Ghostbusters] boasts exuberantly funny performances from its key quartet and a satisfying blend of wackiness, camaraderie and paranormal pizzazz. One could even argue that Paul Feig’s curatorial sideline paying homage to the 1984 action-comedy juggernaut (via story beats, design elements, and many cameo pop-ups) almost becomes an unnecessary distraction…” – Robert Abele, The Wrap

Ghostbusters, Columbia Pictures
How will audiences react to the all-new ‘Ghostbusters’ reboot? Image: Columbia Pictures

“They do, which means that Ghostbusters is also a female-friendship movie, but without the usual genre pro forma tears, jealousies and boyfriends. Friendship here, even at its testiest, is a given, which means that Mr. Feig doesn’t have to worry it and can get on with bringing the funny with his stars and toys, his ghosts and laughs. As is often the case with big-budget flicks, it grows progressively louder and bigger, climaxing in an overlong battle, though not before Mr. Feig has offered up some unexpected touches, including a cavalcade of beautifully designed old-timey ghosts and a genuinely creepy bathroom scene that adds a few horror-flick shivers…” – Manohla Dargis, The New York Times

“While both funnier and scarier than Ivan Reitman’s 1984 original, this otherwise over-familiar remake from Bridesmaids director Paul Feig doesn’t do nearly enough to innovate on what has come before, even going so far as to conjure most of the earlier film’s cast in cameos that undercut the new film’s chemistry…” – Peter Debruge, Variety

The Bad

Ghostbusters, Columbia Pictures
The full team, ‘Ghostbusters’ hits theaters on July 15. Image: Columbia Pictures

“At the end of the day, those who hoped the new Ghostbusters would be just like the original will probably be disappointed. The comedic sensibility is more Paul Feig than Ivan Reitman, the characters and their relationships to one another are completely different, and it all feels more like a 2010s blockbuster film than a 1980s comedy adventure (for pretty obvious reasons). But those willing to roll with the changes will find an entertaining comedy-adventure full of new characters, new gadgets, new monsters, and new possibilities…” – Angie Han, Slashfilm

“[Paul] Feig… has done more than any other filmmaker to expose the idiocy of an industry that still insists that women cannot carry big-studio-financed comedies. But his Ghostbusters… is too risk-averse, despite its nominally radical gender-switching premise. Ghostbusters 2.0 suffers from the anxiety of influence — or, more specifically, from the fear of not wanting to alienate the fans (Gen X’ers and others) of 1.0. It never strays far from the anodyne, generic humor that pervades the [original film]…” – Melissa Anderson, Village Voice

The Ugly

Ghostbusters, columbia pictures
Screenshot from the ‘Ghostbusters’ trailer of the new logo. Image: Columbia Pictures

“Even the funniest actors on the planet couldn’t save what is an occasionally humorous, but largely unremarkable rehash…an unexceptional and even lazy update of a formula you’ve seen before. Comparisons to the original are unavoidable. And yes, it’s a reboot, but there’s a conspicuous absence of the charming oddball eccentricity that made the original film so endearing. Most of the characters are largely indistinguishable from the original archetypes…” – Rodrigo Perez, The Playlist

“After all the handwringing and humdrum, Paul Feig and Katie Dippold’s Ghostbusters turns out to be a relatively unassuming movie of comparatively modest pleasures. The film’s chief asset is ironically the source of its greatest would-be “controversy.” It revels in the comic chemistry and warm friendship offered as a matter of course by its lead actresses. But don’t expect much more than a paint-by-numbers Ghostbusters reboot. The film not only presents its stars as Ghostbusters but as winning comic leads capable of sustaining a mainstream comedy all by themselves. The good news is that the film suggests this should be the natural order of things. The bad news is thanks to some choppy plotting, awkward pacing, and tonal issues, the film rests almost entirely on the shoulders of its would-be heroines…” – Scott Mendelson, Forbes

“In terms of franchise reboots, Ghostbusters is less Batman Begins and more like The Amazing Spider-Man. There’s a lot to like and have fun with this movie, a majority of it being the talent of its lead stars, but there’s also large amounts of room for improvement and fine-tuning as well. I doubt I’ll revisit this movie or any of its jokes the same way that I do with the 1984 original, but if the goal of the latest outing was to make me interested and excited to see this team come together again, then I’d be willing to say that the Ghostbusters reboot is a success in its own right. Even if it’s only a minor one at that…” – Alex Welch, Geek Nation

The Really Ugly

Ghostbusters, Columbia Pictures
‘Ghostbusters’ will reinvent the franchise from the ground up, starting with the Ecto-1. Image: Columbia Pictures

“I went into the movie spoiling for a fight—I really wanted to like director Paul Feig’s reimagining, to prove all the misogynist online naysayers wrong. But Ghostbusters, quick and dull and weightless, offers very little to root for. It spends so much time doing battle with its legacy that it forgets to be its own movie, putting a talented cast to waste and marking another disappointment in this dreadful summer movie season. A lot of hopes, and well north of $150 million, are pinned on Ghostbusters, and the film is smothered under those huge, quadrant-y expectations. Its climax is a muddled, overwrought mess, full of green-screen and senseless zapping…” – Richard Lawson, Vanity Fair

There was even a review that trashed everything the film had to offer. It knocked it for the lack of innovation, and its inability to take advantage of a great cast. The big winner of the most damning review of the film thus far goes to The Hollywood Reporter.

“The unfunny mess that hits theaters July 15, like a big goopy splat of ectoplasm, will no doubt make those naysayers feel vindicated. But the fact is that an estrogen-infused makeover, particularly one with such a comedically gifted cast, was a promising idea. Sadly, that’s where the inventiveness ended. The unfunny mess that hits theaters July 15, like a big goopy splat of ectoplasm, will no doubt make those naysayers feel vindicated. But the fact is that an estrogen-infused makeover, particularly one with such a comedically gifted cast, was a promising idea. Sadly, that’s where the inventiveness ended…” – David Rooney, THR

Ghostbusters hits theaters this Friday, July 15th.

Brad Repka
I am an avid lover of all things Movies, TV, Games, and delicious other randomness. Thanks for reading, and feel free to leave comment!